<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opaquit's blog.en &#187; browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/category/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en</link>
	<description>Let's perform the blog reading event!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Some little features to like about Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/some-little-features-to-like-about-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/some-little-features-to-like-about-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Opaquit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are some of Google Chrome&#8217;s unique useful features. A list of Google Chrome annoyances is coming soon, stay tuned!  

Aero Glass support
What I always liked about Microsoft&#8217;s IE 7 was the fact that it was using Vista&#8217;s native Aero Glass look. Chrome is the first browser to include Aero Glass compatibility since IE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some of Google Chrome&#8217;s unique useful features. A list of Google Chrome annoyances is coming soon, stay tuned! <img src='http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span id="more-25"></span></p>
<h3>Aero Glass support</h3>
<p>What I always liked about Microsoft&#8217;s IE 7 was the fact that it was using Vista&#8217;s native Aero Glass look. Chrome is the first browser to include Aero Glass compatibility since IE 7, which makes the UI look nice and native on Vista. Mozilla should have included it in Firefox 3.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome01.png"><img title="Aero Glass in Chrome" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome01t.png" alt="Aero Glass in Chrome" width="490" height="136" /></a></p>
<h3>Advanced source code view</h3>
<p>This is something I never saw in a web browser before. Chrome has just luxury source code viewer. It displays line numbers and turns everything that looks like a URL into a clickable link.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome02.png"><img title="View source" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome02t.png" alt="View source" width="490" height="302" /></a></p>
<h3>Task manager</h3>
<p>Yeah, you have probably seen the task manager in Google&#8217;s promotional comic book released yesterday. The task manager really rocks—it even has this little link label saying &#8220;Stats for nerds&#8221; that can open advanced memory usage statistics.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome03.png"><img title="Stats for nerds" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome03t.png" alt="Stats for nerds" width="490" height="350" /></a></p>
<h3>Download manager</h3>
<p>Just like Opera and Maxthon, Chrome tries to avoid using extra dialog windows. Almost everything like bookmark manager or a download manager opens its own tab that looks just like a web page.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome04.png"><img title="Downloads" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome04t.png" alt="Downloads" width="490" height="106" /></a></p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome05.png"><img title="Downloads" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome05t.png" alt="Downloads" width="490" height="233" /></a></p>
<h3>Searching within the current page</h3>
<p>This is something we use a lot and don&#8217;t even realize it. When you hit Ctrl+F in Chrome and start searching, every match on the page is automatically highlighted without having to click on a button like in other browsers. Too bad Chrome does not allow you to start searching immediately without pressing Ctrl+F like Firefox does.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome06.png"><img title="Find in Page" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome06t.png" alt="Find in Page" width="490" height="302" /></a></p>
<h3>Great compatibility</h3>
<p>This is just a minor issue&#8230; but did you notice that Chrome has both Gecko and Safari words in its user agent string? This makes work almost every web app that officially supports Firefox or Safari. Not all developers realize that there is something like KHTML and WebKit and some of them often put the word Safari in their browser detection scripts.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome07.png"><img title="User agent" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome07t.png" alt="User agent" width="490" height="126" /></a></p>
<h3>Language the browser UI uses</h3>
<p>It looks like a typical Google product. I especially love the options dialog tab named &#8220;Under the Hood&#8221;.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome08.png"><img title="Language #1" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome08t.png" alt="Language #1" width="490" height="302" /></a></p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome09.png"><img title="Language #2" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome09t.png" alt="Language #2" width="490" height="493" /></a></p>
<h3>Prism-like functionality</h3>
<p>The &#8220;Create application shortcut&#8221; is more useful than Mozilla Prism. Even though the browser bar is hidden when the site is running in &#8220;application mode&#8221;, you can still access basic features like Back and Find in page by clicking the window&#8217;s icon in the top left corner.</p>
<p><a class="nepodtrh" href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome10.png"><img title="Create application shortcut" src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/chrome10t.png" alt="Create application shortcut" width="490" height="325" /></a></p>
<h3>Duplicate tab</h3>
<p>Chrome allows you to duplicate any tab through its right-click menu.</p>
<h3>Installing missing plugins</h3>
<p>If a site requires a certain plugin, Chrome will take you to the download page immediately, in most cases you don&#8217;t need to search through the whole plugin vendor&#8217;s site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/some-little-features-to-like-about-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari for Windows: A new beta release</title>
		<link>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/safari-for-windows-a-new-beta-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/safari-for-windows-a-new-beta-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Opaquit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/safari-for-windows-a-new-beta-release/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is not going to be very long. You may remember my post where I complained about Safari for Windows beta bugs. Well, I gave this browser another shot and downloaded it again. Now the About box says 3.0.3 and everything works fine for me. The first beta release was probably not compatible with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is not going to be very long. You may remember my post where I complained about Safari for Windows beta bugs. Well, I gave this browser another shot and downloaded it again. Now the About box says 3.0.3 and everything works fine for me. The first beta release was probably not compatible with localized versions of Windows. Great job Apple, I wish you never released the first beta because it must have given this browser a bad name among Windows users. The current release works fast with no major bugs. All I can complain about is the lack of advanced features, even IE7 is more comfortable, so this is why I&#8217;m gonna stick with my Firefox and use Safari just for website testing. You can download the latest <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">Safari for Windows here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/safari-for-windows-a-new-beta-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple releases Safari 3 beta for Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/apple-safari-3-beta-available-for-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/apple-safari-3-beta-available-for-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Opaquit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple guys have finally released their Safari web browser for Windows along with official website redesign. I know it&#8217;s not the final release but the current Windows version is completely unusable. Although the program interface is beautiful, the program itself has too many errors even for a beta. Here are some bugs I came across [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple guys have finally released their <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">Safari web browser for Windows</a> along with official website redesign. I know it&#8217;s not the final release but the current Windows version is completely unusable. Although the program interface is beautiful, the program itself has too many errors even for a beta. Here are some bugs I came across during the first moments of testing:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>It won&#8217;t run on many computers.</strong> I tried Safari on two Windows XP PCs and one Windows Vista PC and it worked just on the last one. Both Windows XP computers did nothing when Safari.exe was executed. It might have been caused by the fact that I unchecked the &#8220;Install Bonjour&#8221; checkbox on those Windows XP systems but the browser is supposed to work without this, isn&#8217;t it?</li>
<li><strong>Heading tags that contain links are hardly rendered correctly.</strong> They&#8217;re just missing on most sites.<br />
<a href="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/safari_1.png" class="nepodtrh"><img src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/safari_1_nahled.png" title="Where's the post heading?!" alt="Where's the post heading?!" height="215" width="450" /></a><br />
<small>Where&#8217;s the post heading?</small></li>
<li><strong>The Bookmarks button doesn&#8217;t work.</strong> Every time I click this button, the browser crashes.<br />
<img src="http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/stuff/img/safari_2.png" title="Safari Web Browser has stopped working" alt="Safari Web Browser has stopped working" height="183" width="366" /><br />
<small>Safari Web Browser has stopped working</small></li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s too slow for me.</strong> The official site says it&#8217;s the fasted browser ever. Compared to Firefox and Opera, Safari for Windows is extremely slow. Also the interface animated effects make working with the browser slower. I wonder why they don&#8217;t use smooth scrolling.</li>
</ol>
<p>If all the major bugs get fixed in the final release, Safari will provide a decent browsing experience on Windows and the web developers will be happy for not having to get a Mac or Mac emulator to test and debug their sites.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for today, these were my first impressions about Safari for Windows, expect more to come tomorrow. And what&#8217;s your opinion about Safari for Windows? Share it in the comments below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.opaquit.com/blog.en/apple-safari-3-beta-available-for-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
